Skip to content

Performance

Performance is where you run formal reviews and track the goals people are measured against. It holds the cycle from an employee’s self-assessment through to a released rating, and keeps the goals and metrics those ratings are argued from.

The performance cycles list showing three cycles with their review periods, statuses, current phases and participant counts — one completed at 100 per cent, one active in manager review at 40 per cent.

A review is not one event. A cycle moves through phases, and the phase decides who can act and what anyone can see.

OptionDescription
SelfEmployees assess their own performance.
ManagerManagers rate their reports and tie the rating to goals.
CalibrationRatings are normalised across teams so they mean the same thing.
ReleaseHR publishes results, and only then do employees see them.

Example: Olivia Bennett rates her engineers during the manager phase. James Whitfield cannot see her rating or her comments until HC Corp releases the cycle.

This is the single most important behaviour in the section. Manager ratings and comments stay hidden from the employee until HR explicitly releases the cycle.

It exists because ratings change during calibration. An employee who saw a draft rating and then saw a different final one would be right to ask which was real, and the answer would damage trust in the whole process.

Example: if Olivia Bennett’s initial rating for James Whitfield is adjusted during calibration, he sees only the final released result — not the draft that preceded it.

Once results are released, employees acknowledge them, which records that the conversation happened.

Calibration sessions normalise ratings across teams before release, so a “strong” from one manager means what a “strong” from another does. Sessions can be locked once agreed. Calibration is available on the Enterprise and Enterprise Plus plans.

A rating is more defensible when it points at something recorded during the year rather than at a manager’s memory of it.

OptionDescription
Goals and OKRsObjectives with key results and check-ins, alignable up and down an org-wide cascade tree.
Operational KPIsPerpetual red, amber, and green metrics with measurement history and a trend, rather than a target that closes.

The distinction matters. A goal is something you finish; a KPI is something you hold. Example: “launch the new billing service this quarter” is a goal for James Whitfield. “Keep incidents under an agreed threshold” is a KPI — it never completes, it either stays green or does not.

Scales are configurable rather than fixed, with your own labels, colours, and a flag for which points count as acceptable. Define the scale before a cycle opens, because changing it mid-cycle changes what ratings already given mean.

A Performance Improvement Plan runs from draft to activation, through checkpoints, to a recorded outcome. Its outcomes reach outside this section: an outcome can confirm a probation decision or route to a termination request, rather than ending in a document nobody acts on. Create a performance improvement plan covers drafting one, and run and close a performance improvement plan covers everything after that.

Performance-based rewards decide eligibility by rule — combining performance tier with discipline history — and freeze the result as an immutable snapshot. Employees get a transparency view showing how their own outcome was reached: read your rewards covers what it shows and why a projected figure is not yet final.

Ratings feed compensation: merit proposals are argued from performance, and reward eligibility is calculated from it. Rating history accumulates per employee and per team across cycles, which is what makes promotion and succession discussions evidence-based rather than anecdotal.